
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After completing Module 9, the learner should be able to:
1. Name factors which contribute to the determination of monitoring intensity in islet autoantibody positive individuals.
2. Name methods for evaluating for dysglycemia in early-stage (presymptomatic) T1D.
3. Name symptoms of hyperglycemia and identify the symptoms that should prompt the person to access care immediately.
Monitoring and Managing Islet Autoantibody Positive Patients
09 |
Module Authors: Kimberly Bautista, Flor Sepulveda, Iman Taki, Brigitte Frohnert, Andrea Steck
Monitoring for Symptoms or Evidence of Dysglycemia
All patients with confirmed islet autoantibodies should be assessed at follow-up visits for dysglycemia or development of symptomatic (Stage 3) T1D:
-
Measurement of HbA1c and random blood glucose (RBG)
-
Evaluate for symptoms of hyperglycemia
– Polydipsia
– Polyuria​ (new bed wetting in previously dry child)
– Weight loss/poor weight gain in growing child
– Fatigue
-
Teach individuals/families regarding symptoms that should trigger expeditious evaluation: lethargy/confusion​, vomiting, rapid breathing​
-
If symptoms or glycemic measures (HbA1c, RBG) raise concerns, teach use of glucometer
(see Figure 2 and Home Glucose Testing section below)

FIGURE 1 Timeline and characteristics of the stages of type 1 diabetes. See Module 1 for details of ADA staging criteria including normoglycemia and dysglycemia.
Monitoring Guidelines Based on Stages of T1D
Individuals with confirmed positive islet autoantibody results should be monitored on a regular schedule. The monitoring regimen will vary depending on the stage of T1D as well as the age of the patient.(1,2) To engage the individual in active monitoring at home and in clinics, it is important to provide educational materials regarding the disease process, stages of T1D, how to monitor, and the importance of monitoring.
The following monitoring recommendations are based on expert experience and opinion (see the interactive Screening and Monitoring algorithm). As monitoring recommendations are continually evolving it is important to visit the STOP T1D website for updates on monitoring guidelines.
Current recommendations based on confirmed islet autoantibody status are as follows:
​
​Autoantibody and Normoglycemic
Individuals with a single autoantibody are at lower risk. In the absence of symptoms or abnormal glycemic measurements, it is recommended to follow up for repeat assessment in 6 months if age 3 years or younger and in one year for those 4 years and older (including measurement of autoantibodies to determine whether the individual has become multiple IAb positive and glycemic assessment with glucose and HbA1c).
Single High Affinity Autoantibody and Normoglycemic
In some cases, access to more advanced autoantibody assays, including the ECL assay (see Module 5), can further determine if the single autoantibody is high affinity, which confers a greater risk of progression. For those with a single high affinity autoantibody, regardless of age, the recommendation is for follow-up assessment every 6 months. They should also receive a glucometer and be taught how to do home glucose testing (Figure 2).
​​
Single High Affinity Autoantibody and Evidence of Dysglycemia (Stage 2 T1D)
If the results of the symptoms review, HbA1c and BG show that the person is dysglycemic, meaning a BG of 140-199 or an HbA1c of 5.7-6.4, they should follow the recommendations listed under Stage 2 T1D.
Confirmed Multiple Autoantibody Positive (Stage 1 T1D)
In the absence of evidence of dysglycemia, the recommendation is for monitoring every 3-12 months depending on age. [See/download a detailed age-based monitoring schedule from Ask the Experts.] The patient/family should also receive a glucometer and instruction on home glucose testing (see Figure 2 and Home Glucose Testing section below) and may benefit from intermittent CGM wear.
​

FIGURE 2 Front of Patient Information Card available at AsktheExpers.org

FIGURE 3 Reverse side of Information Card
Confirmed Islet Autoantibody Positivity and Evidence of Dysglycemia (Stage 2 T1D)
An individual in Stage 2 T1D should be evaluated every 3-6 months depending on age to ensure medical safety and to determine metabolic staging. [See/download a detailed age-based monitoring schedule​ from Ask the Experts.] This will also allow for opportunities to discuss eligibility for therapeutic options with the goal of delaying progression to Stage 3 T1D. The patient/family should also receive a glucometer and instruction on home glucose testing (see Figure 2) or intermittent CGM wear. A home glucose testing card can guide when to test and what to do based on the glucose result (Figure 2 and 3).(3)
​
Use of Home Monitoring
It should be noted that ONLY serum glucose values (during OGTT or random) and HbA1c results are approved ADA criteria for staging of type 1 diabetes (in conjunction with islet autoantibody status).
While home glucose testing and CGM monitoring are NOT included in the ADA criteria for Stage 2 or Stage 3 T1D, they can be very helpful to identify changes in glycemic profile as they can be performed easily at home and do not require a blood draw or clinic visit. Individuals with evidence of dysglycemia by home glucose testing or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) should be considered at higher risk. These individuals may be targeted for additional testing by OGTT, HbA1c or serum glucose in order to determine whether they meet criteria for Stage 2 or Stage 3 T1D.
Methods for Monitoring of Glycemic Changes
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
The hemoglobin A1c test result reflects a person's average blood sugar level over the past three months. Specifically, the hemoglobin A1c (also called the glycated hemoglobin, glycosylated hemoglobin, hemoglobin A1C or HbA1c test) measures what percentage of hemoglobin proteins in the blood are coated with sugar (glycated). As discussed above, measurement of HbA1c is a cornerstone of monitoring. Both elevation (5.7 to 6.4%) as well as increase of 10% or more from previous measurement are amongst the criteria for Stage 2 T1D. However, while an abnormal HbA1c is informative, it can miss acute evolution of dysglycemia and is not as sensitive in children who may progress quickly. Further, abnormalities in HbA1c occur relatively late in disease progression. Finally, the HbA1c can be less accurate in those with anemia or disorders which impact red blood cell production and destruction.
​
Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
OGTTs are part of the gold standard for staging and diagnosing T1D. For people in Stage 1 or Stage 2 it is recommended to obtain an OGTT every 6-12 months to determine metabolic staging. However, OGTT may not be feasible in all people. Some patients may be averse to OGTTs, due to need for fasting, testing over multiple hours, or the needle sticks involved in multiple blood draws or IV placement. Standard testing involves drinking a solution containing glucose (1.75 g per kg of body weight up to a maximum of 75 g) followed by blood plasma sampling at 6 time points (-10, 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes); however, a 2-point OGTT (samples at 0 and 120 minutes) may suffice. OGTTs used in the clinical setting often do not include measurement of c-peptide as it is not a component of clinical criteria; however, these measures are often utilized in research studies (see “Monitoring in Research Studies” below). See instruction sheet for OGTT testing and interpretation from AskTheExperts.org
​
Home Glucose Testing
Home glucose testing (HGT) is easy and inexpensive and should use glucometers which meet FDA guidelines.(4) While HGT is NOT an accepted ADA criteria for staging of T1D, patients are empowered to participate in their own monitoring and can obtain instant feedback when concerning symptoms arise. There is a long history of intermittent home glucose testing for high-risk participants in prospective studies and routine home glucose assessment is often a key component of early recognition of progression to Stage 3 T1D. Limitations include the logistics involved in the communication of results or frequency of testing. Many individuals require reminders to test at home. As post-prandial hyperglycemia is typically the first apparent abnormality, this is the preferred testing time. Intermittent testing is typically recommended; however, if there are significant concerns that transition to Stage 3 T1D may be imminent, the person/family can be instructed to test daily for five days and contact the healthcare provider with the results.
Typical instructions for home glucose testing:
-
Baseline testing frequency by stage:
-
Stage 1 T1D: Test one to two times per month.
-
Stage 2 T1D: Test weekly.
-
-
Test daily if ill or experiencing symptoms of hyperglycemia.
-
Testing 2 hours after the biggest meal is preferred, as the 2-hour post-meal value is considered to be the most predictive of progressing dysglycemia(1), but testing before breakfast or at any convenient time is also acceptable.
-
Remember to always wash hands with soap and water before testing to prevent any false readings.
-
Use glucose testing information card to guide response to testing results (Figure 2).
TABLE 1 Home Glucose and CGM Testing Ranges Guidelines
NOTE: Neither home glucose testing nor CGM values are accepted criteria for staging of T1D by ADA or ISPAD guidelines.

​Elevated or high values should ONLY be used to prompt further evaluation. Those who have elevated or high values be instructed to wash hands well, test finger stick glucose (to validate CGM value or repeat test of initial glucometer result) and then contact health care team for further evaluation. Any “HI” result on the glucometer should prompt immediate evaluation.
​
Normal values may miss intermittent elevations and can underestimate progressive loss of beta cell function in individuals who eat low carbohydrate diets. While “normal” values do not rule out progression of disease, they can be somewhat reassuring.
Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGM)
Benefits of CGM Monitoring​
While CGM data is NOT an accepted ADA criteria for staging of T1D, CGMs are easy to wear, and patients can be taught to place them on themselves, giving patients an opportunity to participate in monitoring and to feel empowered. Many patients find CGM monitoring more acceptable than OGTTs or intermittent home glucose testing. Another benefit of CGM assessment is the ability to share results with the patient/family and to obtain detailed information about blood glucose variation while the person is eating their usual diet and participating in their normal daily activities. Sometimes, evidence of increasing glucose levels on CGM can encourage patients to undergo an OGTT for formal staging and evaluation of eligibility for immunotherapies. CGMs have the potential to identify important glycemic changes earlier than the less sensitive HbA1c or OGTT tests which are not practical for frequent assessments. They can also be used during times of physiologic stress (e.g. fevers, illness) or use of medication which impacts glycemic excursions (e.g. corticosteroids) to evaluate transient changes in glucose values. A common metric which has been shown to be associated with progression to Stage 3 T1D is the percent sensor values above 140 mg/dL.(2)
Considerations for CGM use:
One important caveat in the use of CGMs for monitoring is the potential for errors in calibration and tendency for less accurate data in the first 24 hours of wear. This can be addressed by obtaining a few fasting fingerstick blood glucose values.
Blinded CGM wear:
Historically, CGMs used for monitoring of early-stage T1D in research studies have been worn in a blinded state. Data from the blinded CGM can be downloaded by the health care team and can be used to evaluate overall trends in glycemic excursions. Families can be given data alongside interpretation following CGM wear. This approach has the advantage of giving families context for data which may be unfamiliar and anxiety-provoking. The time above 140 mg/dL measure as well as interval changes from previous wears and a printout of sensor tracings may be shared with the family. Post-measurement discussion of blinded CGM findings allows sharing of information in the context of education regarding its meaning and an opportunity to answer questions and provide support.
​
Unblinded CGM wear:
Unblinded CGMs provide patients/families with a constant input of data which many individuals are not equipped to interpret unless provided with education and support. Some individuals can experience psychological distress due to this constant ambiguous information and may become anxious if they see what they perceive to be abnormally low or high blood sugars.
Even families with experience using CGM for management of Stage 3 T1D may not be aware of what constitutes a cause for concern in people who are not using insulin. For example, individuals who are using insulin are typically taught to treat blood glucose values less than 70 mg/dL. This threshold is deliberately higher than the threshold of 54 mg/dL, the level at which neuroglycopenic symptoms begin to be noted, including changes in cognition, behavior, and risk for adverse events. Healthy individuals who are not using exogenous insulin have intact counterregulatory response to falling glucose levels, thus do not typically require intervention or concern for glucose values in the low normal range. For example, healthy individuals 7-80 years of age spend a median of 1.1% of their day with glucose below 70 mg/dL.(5) In healthy young children (2-8 years of age), with more limited hepatic glycogen stores, 9% of sensor values are below 72 mg/dL, particularly notable in the early morning hours before waking.(6)
Providing education is ESSENTIAL before using unblinded CGM. Topics should include:
-
Limitations of CGM data, including less reliable results in first 24 hours
-
Normal values expected
-
Importance of verification of high/low results with fingerstick blood glucose
-
What to do/who to call when values are outside of expected range
Blinded vs Unblinded CGM summary:
It is recommended that unblinded CGM wear is used only in the context of education by experienced providers and availability of psychological support.
This approach was piloted in individuals with Stage 2 T1D as part of The Early Start Study (TESS) at our center. Initial participant feedback to this approach was overall positive, and patients were able to gain an understanding of factors that impacted glycemic patterns. While most participants elected to continue using unblinded CGM following this study, there were a few families who elected to only use blinded CGM in order to reduce worries and focus on blood glucose trends. Commercially available CGMs do not have an option for blinded wear. This can be addressed by linking the CGM to a smartphone or receiver device that is not with the person at all times, but is brought in proximity periodically to download data to app/receiver. Dexcom G7 stores 24 hours of data and the Libre 3 stores 14 days of data.
CGM in Stage 1 T1D
It is debatable whether unblinded CGM is as useful in individuals in Stage 1 T1D. In people with normal beta cell function, CGM tracings are typically very stable, thus opportunities to benefit from education during unblinded CGM wear are more limited. Ask the Experts has CGM guidance cards, which were adapted from the TESS study. These reference cards give the patient and family guidance on how to respond to both high and low values on their CGM (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4
Monitoring in Research Studies
​
A variety of indicators are used in research studies of early-stage T1D. There is as yet no consensus for their use in the clinical sphere; however, future work may incorporate these and other measures into both risk assessment as well as patient selection for clinical intervention.
Islet autoantibody pattern
Both the pattern of positive autoantibodies, including the appearance or disappearance of autoantibodies over time, as well as the antibody titers have been analyzed in those participating in prospective studies of islet autoimmunity. There is evidence that both pattern and titer of autoantibodies may be useful in prognosis of progression to Stage 3 T1D.
Risk scores
A variety of risk scores encompassing demographic characteristics as well as anthropomorphic, genetic, and metabolic measures have been developed for use in prognosis and tracking of progression in the context of clinical trials. Measures of pro-insulin and c-peptide and their ratios are often components of these risk scores as well as monitoring during intervention studies. Genetic risk scores are being incorporated into some screening strategies to identify high-risk children who are then targeted for autoantibody screening (see Module 2).
​
​
REFERENCES
1. Simmons K, Frohnert B, O’Donnell H, et al. Historical Insights and Current Perspectives on the Diagnosis and Management of Pre-Symptomatic Type 1 Diabetes.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Nov;25(11):790-799.
2. Phillip M, Achenbach P, Addala A, Albanese-O’Neill A, Battelino T, Bell KJ, et al. Consensus guidance for monitoring individuals with islet
autoantibody-positive pre-stage 3 type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2024 Jun 24.
3. Home | Ask the Experts – Early T1D Answers and Guidance [Internet]. AsktheExperts. [cited 2023 Dec 9]; Available from: https://www.asktheexperts.org
5. Shah VN, DuBose SN, Li Z, Beck RW, Peters AL, Weinstock RS, et al. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles in Healthy Nondiabetic Participants: A Multicenter
Prospective Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Oct 1;104(10):4356–64. doi:10.1210/jc.2018-02763 PubMed PMID: 31127824; PubMed Central PMCID:
PMC7296129.
6. Sundberg F, Forsander G. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Healthy Children Aged 2–8 Years. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Feb 1;20(2):113–6.
doi:10.1089/dia.2017.0270